About Me

My photo
Former teacher, clinical social worker and now entrepreneur. My focus, no matter what career I am engaged in, has been on helping people. Now I am on an incredible journey to change life in a leaner, cleaner, greener way. I hope you will join me in this transition.
Showing posts with label medical study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical study. Show all posts

Friday, November 30, 2012

A reasonable discussion: Are GMOs Safe?

Is it safe?
Are GMOs Safe?
November 30, 2012 in Digestive problems, Food & Nutrition, Myths & Truths, Toxins
Genetically modified foods (GMOs) have been popular in the news lately ever since California failed to pass Prop 37, which would have required the labeling of GMO ingredients on all products sold within the state. While California may be setting the stage for the discussion of future labeling of GMO foods in our country, currently there is no regulation anywhere in the United States requiring the disclosure of GMO ingredients to consumers. This is in contrast to countries such as those in Europe and South America, who highly regulate the cultivation and sale of genetically modified crops and often require the labeling of foods that contain GMO ingredients (1, 2). In America, unless you buy certified non-GMO food, there is no way to know if your food contains GMOs or not.
So why does it matter if our food contains GMOs? You may have heard from various media sources that genetically modified foods are perfectly safe and there is no evidence to suggest any long term risk from their consumption. On the contrary, there has been some evidence suggesting potential health risks caused by these foods; even scientists within the FDA itself have repeatedly warned that GM foods can create unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects, including allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. (3, 4) With so much conflicting information, it’s hard to tell fact from fiction. Are GMOs safe for human consumption, or not?
What is Genetic Modification?
Genetic modification involves the transfer of genes from one species of plant or animal to another, using techniques that can cause mutations in the genome that may have unintended consequences for the crop’s safety. (5) The imprecise rearrangement of genes can create new proteins in these plants that may trigger allergies or promote disease. (6) Our immune systems often do not recognize these new proteins and may mount an immune attack against them if they enter our bloodstream intact. These unintended gene transfers, along with those that are intended, can lead to significant changes in gut and immune function, and may have long-term consequences that are not yet known to the scientific and medical communities.
In genetically modified corn and cotton, a gene from a bacteria called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is inserted, which causes a pesticidal toxin to be produced in every cell of the plant. This Bt-toxin kills insects that eat the plant by breaking down its gut lining and killing the insect from septicemia caused by the ensuing blood infection. (7) While this toxin has not been proven to be toxic in this way for humans and other mammals, several recent studies have suggested this toxin could have effects on immune health, gut health, liver and kidney function, and fertility.
The potential dangers of GMOs
The gut is most susceptible to the potential dangers of GMO consumption. Bt toxin produced by GMO corn has been shown to significantly alter immune function in mice, and may cause disrupted immune function in the gut. (8, 9, 10) One study suggested that Bt toxin has toxic effects on human cells in vitro, causing them to die prematurely. (11) This could cause damage to gut endothelial cells if the toxicity is found to occur in vivo. The potential intestinal effects of GMO consumption go beyond Bt toxin. Some argue that gut bacteria are capable of acquiring DNA sequences from GM plants, which could lead to the development of antibiotic resistance in those microbes. (12) It is not yet fully understood what proportion of the GM genes are able to be transferred to gut microbiota.
There have been effects of GM corn found on organs outside of the intestinal system as well. Analysis of Monsanto’s own research and independent research by a lab in France determined that mice and rats eating Bt-toxin producing corn sustained liver and kidney damage. (13, 14) Other harmful effects were also noticed in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen and hematopoietic system of these GM corn-fed rats. Bt toxin has also been demonstrated to reduce fertility in mice, with fewer offspring being produced than by mice fed on natural crops. (15) While these are small, preliminary studies, it’s worth investigating the effects GMOs can have on other organs besides the intestines.
Since the research is in its infancy, GMOs may have associated health risks that we do not fully understand. The organization known as The Institute for Responsible Technology has developed a list of potential hazards of GMO consumption, providing a list of references for each health risk discussed. They have amassed a great deal of support for their position that GMOs are dangerous, and much of their information comes from research studies, clinical experience from doctors, and anecdotal evidence from farmers and parents of children who thrived on a GMO-free diet. (Unfortunately, the website’s statements exaggerate the findings of several studies, so it’s best to be a critical thinker and take the information with a grain of salt.)
Why is there still controversy?
Recent reviews have proposed a different story when it comes to GMO safety, arguing that the bulk of the evidence demonstrates no health risks associated with GMO consumption. (16, 17, 18) These reviews found GMOs to be generally safe with no multigenerational effects, but also recommended that more research continue to be performed on the health effects of GMO consumption in mammals. It’s interesting to note, however, that the majority of the studies considered by these reviews had been conducted by biotechnology companies responsible for commercializing these GM plants; this conflict of interest could have an effect on the reporting of certain data. That said, there’s no denying the fact that independent critical reviews have so far found GMOs to be safe in food.
Unfortunately, credible research demonstrating the potential dangers of GMOs is not only sparse, it is also inconsistent. While many scientists argue that GMOs are unsafe for human consumption, there are many more scientists who suggest that the evidence to date has not found any significant health risks from ingesting GMOs. It’s impossible to tell at this point who has the right answer, and it’s unnerving that there is so much controversy over the safety of a food product that is present in 60 to 70 percent of processed foods found in grocery stores. (19)
A verdict on GMOs?There hasn’t been nearly enough research performed on GMOs to make an informed decision on their safety. However, lack of proof is not proof against. While the available evidence is still mixed, it seems likely that genetically modified foods could have an effect on the immune response as well as the permeability of the gut. Whether or not this leads to an increase in disease is yet to be determined. However, if regular consumption of GMOs is able to cause leaky gut, it could play a role in the recent dramatic rise in obesity, diabetes, allergies, autoimmune disease, and infertility in our country.
I’m no conspiracy theorist, but I think there is enough inconsistency in the available evidence to support the removal of GMOs from your diet. Fortunately, purchasing certified non-GMO or organic foods and eating a whole-foods or Paleo diet will allow you to steer clear of most GMO foods on the market. Until more legitimate research is conducted, I believe it’s better to be safe than sorry and avoid genetically modified foods as much as possible.
For more information click HERE.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

University Study Finds Isagenix Superior to Leading “Heart Healthy” Diet

September 20, 2012 IsagenixHealth.net
Dr. Krista Varaday
University of Illinois
Chicago College of Applied Sciences

Dr. Krista Varady discusses clinical research on Isagenix products.
The highly anticipated results are in—Isagenix products are superior to a leading “heart healthy” dietary plan for weight loss and visceral fat loss. The manuscript has been submitted to two peer-reviewed journals and is still under review; however, you can read more details about the study on our clinical research summary and marketing flyer.
Krista Varady, Ph.D., the lead investigator of the study, is a prolific researcher at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s College of Applied Sciences with more than 30 peer-reviewed research publications. She has a Ph.D. in nutrition from McGill University—one of the top universities in Canada. Dr. Varady has devoted much of her time to investigating the ability of weight-management strategies to decrease cardiovascular disease risk and is one of the pioneers in research on alternate-day and intermittent fasting.
Dr. Varady’s research was presented in August at the 10th annual Isagenix Celebration in Phoenix. Eager to share the exciting results, Dr. Varady answered questions from Isagenix Chief Science Officer Suk Cho, Ph.D.:
Q: What did you think when you tried Isagenix?
A: I always try things before I make my subjects do it. I used Isagenix for three weeks in January before we began the study. I didn’t want to lose a ton of weight, but I did want to see if I could lose a few pounds with it. The easy of use was great—no dishes at breakfast or lunch; you didn’t even need to have milk at home. I went out and bought a few shake products to compare it to and I’m not sure what you guys do, but the consistency is like a smoothie. The other shakes were clumpy and it made them less appealing.
Q: What else impressed you about Isagenix products?
A: I was impressed by the Cleanse Day and the high-protein IsaLean® Shake. All the ingredients actually seemed wholesome. I had thought the shake would be a high-sugar beverage, but I found it to be really nutritionally complete.
Q: What attracted you to collaborate with Isagenix on research using their products?
A:  The main thing was that Isagenix incorporates fasting while on Cleanse Days. I find that really novel. If you look at other meal-replacement diets, they never really incorporate fasting or cleansing. Usually it is a shake for breakfast and a shake for lunch, but they don’t use all the other products Isagenix uses. I like that it is a multifaceted approach. You are also using supplements that may provide metabolic benefit and protect against free radicals—I thought that was really neat too, but the main thing was that there was a Cleanse Day every week because I am really interested in fasting research.
Q: What can you tell us about the study’s results?
A: Our main finding was that weight loss was actually greater in the Isagenix group. On average they lost 3.9 kg, so that works out to be around 9 pounds or so. Obviously, some lost more and some less, but the Isagenix group lost 3 pounds more on average than the other diet. We also saw those changes with fat mass. With Isagenix, we saw slightly greater reductions (although not significant) in fat mass. Neither group lost a significant amount of lean mass, which is great because you want to maintain your muscle mass to keep your metabolic rate higher and that allows you to burn more calories per hour.
Q: What are the results for visceral fat (fat that surrounds the organs)?
A: Even though it wasn’t statistically significant between groups, we found that there was a much greater reduction in visceral fat in the Isagenix group—about twice as much. They lost 0.7 kg, about 2 pounds. I find that amazing—they lost 2 pounds around their organs—that’s a lot!
Q: What other part of this study’s results do you find most exciting or intriguing?
A: What I found most intriguing at first was the adherence of the Isagenix group; they seemed to adhere better because of the convenience factor of the Isagenix system. Also, the Isagenix group lost more weight and more fat (especially visceral fat); and the blood chemistry looked wonderful.
Q: What other personal observations have you made about the Isagenix products and how they affect subjects?
A: Isagenix people just seemed happier. Also, the satiety (or fullness) aspect; people didn’t feel motivated to binge after a shake or cheat on the diet because they really did find those shakes quite filling, so I was pretty impressed with that. That is the main reason that I am even testing out these diets—to find diets that people will actually do and adhere to over the long term. They liked the taste of the shake and just in terms of the easiness too, they said small things like “there were less dishes to wash” and “for breakfast all you really have to do is keep the blender clean, there’s not that much prep involved and it is a portable system.” But those are actually really important things—if a diet is hard to do, people aren’t going to do it for very long. So making it easy, making it easy to clean up after—all those things add up for long term weight loss.
Q: You had some products left over after the study and people asked you for them, right?
A: Yeah, I had 3 boxes left of the shakes and I have never seen women diving in there, fighting with each other. They were all over each other. Those were gone pretty quickly after we opened them up!

Sunday, October 7, 2012

So You STILL Think Soy is a Health Food

Image from usc.edu
I have written several posts about the dangers of soy because it is a GMO produced crop.  In fact if you are still consuming soy in your morning shakes, drinks and meatless dishes, I can only think you are just not paying attention or you have a death wish.  Just kidding about the death wish thing, but soy is VERY detrimental to your health.
I read an article by Sarah, The Healthy Home Economist (http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/170-scientific-reasons-to-lose-the-soy-in-your-diet/) and I am going to share part of the article with you.
Sarah quotes from an article entitled “The Whole Soy Story” by Dr. Kaayla Daniel.
1.  A 1991 study found that eating only 2 TBL/day of roasted and pickled soybeans for 3 months to healthy adults who were receiving adequate iodine in their diet caused thyroid suppression with symptoms of malaise, constipation, sleepiness, and goiters (Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 1991, 767: 622-629)!
2.  Six premenopausal women with normal menstrual cycles were given 45 mg of soy isoflavones per day.  This is equivalent to only 1-2 cups of soy milk or 1/2 cup of soy flour!   After only one month, all of the women experienced delayed menstruation with the effects similar to tamoxifen, the anti-estrogen drug given to women with breast cancer (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994 Sep;60(3):333-340).
3.  Dietary estrogens in the form of soy foods were found to have the potential to disrupt the endocrine system with the effects in women similar to taking the breast cancer drug tamoxifen (Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 1995 Jan;208(1):51-9).
4.  Estrogens consumed in the diet at low concentrations were found to stimulate breast cells much like DDT to increase enzymatic activity which leads to breast cancer (Environmental Health Perspectives 1997 Apr;105 (Suppl 3):633-636).
5.  The soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein appear to stimulate existing breast cancer growth indicating risk in consuming soy products if a woman has breast cancer. (Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2001 Sep;35(9):118-21).
6.  Direct evidence that soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein suppress the pituitary-thyroid axis in middle-aged rats fed 10 mg soy isoflavones per kilo after only 3 weeks as compared with rats eating regular rat chow (Experimental Biology and Medicine 2010 May;235(5):590-8).
7.  Don’t eat soy when you are pregnant ladies!  Scientific research has shown that the developing male fetus which is exposed to soy phytoestrogens may suffer from higher susceptibility to prostate cancer later in life (Prostate 1994;24(2):67-78).
8.  Keep that soy away from your daughters!   Dietary genistein (soy phytoestrogen) in developing female rats had the effect of significantly accelerated puberty (Toxicol Sci 1999 Oct;51(2):236-44).
9.  Hey guys! Soy protein powder strips your masculinity!  A study of 12 men aged 18 years and older experienced a 19% drop in serum testosterone in only 28 days when supplemented with 56 grams of soy protein powder over that same time period (Prev 2007;16:829–33).
10.  Do NOT feed soy formula to your babies!  Female newborns who are orally exposed to genisin, the glycosylated form of genistein (soy phytoestrogen) experienced harm to the reproductive system in the form of “delayed vaginal opening… abnormal estrous cycles, decreased fertility, and delayed parturition.” (Environmental Health Perspective 2009 Dec;117(12):1883-9).
This is only 10 of the reason you should totally eliminate soy from your diet.  If you are interested in more studies, google and read the article, “The Whole Soy Story.”

Friday, September 14, 2012

Landmark Study: Anti-Aging & Telomerase

In a landmark study demonstrating “proof of principle” of the feasibility and safety of “slowing or turning back the clock,” Spanish researchers gave aged mice a single treatment to stimulate genetic expression of telomerase that extended health and lifespan by up to 24 percent.

My company is defintely leads in the anti-aging arena. Check out this video. You will be amazed!!

http://www.isagenixhealth.net/blog/2012/05/16/telomerase-stimulation-extends-lifespan-in-mice/

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Telomeres and Living Longer

Our company, Isagenix, is at the right place at the right time.  We are working with Dr. Bill Andrews, Sierra Labs, and John Anderson, founder of Isagenix, who are working on life extending natural supplement that will keep the teleomeres from shortening with age.  This article is from The TODAY Show interview with Dr. Andrews.  [Just a note:  Since Tom and I started using Product B, we have an abundance of energy and we feel so much better ... it is amazing!!  We love it!!!]



On the TODAY Show, Dr. Andrews and his father, Ralph, exemplify what it means to defy aging through exercise and supplementation.

“Could people soon be living forever?” A story by Linda Carroll posted on MSN.com, based on TODAY Show reporting by Michelle Kosinski, brings more attention to this captivating question and to the scientists researching all aspects approaching it, including telomere biologist Bill Andrews, Ph.D.

In the story, Dr. Andrews is credited for his work in the development of a supplement that is said to help keep “telomeres from shortening with age.” The supplement, created by Isagenix Founder John Anderson in collaboration with Dr. Andrews, is Isagenix Product B™.

Carrol’s report describes telomeres, the complex non-coding DNA structures at the tips of chromosomes that act as protective caps, and how as they “become shorter, we deteriorate.”
Dr. Andrews is quoted as saying, “The literature is, I would say, 95 percent certain or better that if we can find ways to lengthen the telomeres, we are going to reverse aging.”

Telomeres? Tell Me More
As noted by Kosinski and Carrol, it’s hard to believe the day will soon come when people can live in perpetual youth. Skeptics are inclined to ask, What is the literature that Dr. Andrews speaks of? and What can we do now to make the most of the science behind healthy aging?
The facts are that the scientific literature on telomeres and their influence in aging that Dr. Andrews speaks of is as exciting and promising as it sounds, even leading to the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2009.

Recent research at Harvard Medical School in Boston showed reversing telomere shortening in mice also reversed their aging (1). The lab also found a connection between telomere shortening and other known factors of aging—dysfunctional mitochondria and oxidative stress—adding evidence of a core pathway of aging that starts with telomere shortening (2).
In the video segment, Dr. Andrews and his father, Ralph, are seen following precisely the kind of lifestyle, according to data gleaned by recent studies, that best supports the length of their telomeres—namely, by performing daily exercise and taking Ageless Essentials Daily Pack with Product B.

Regular exercise is associated with telomere length, as is receiving optimal dosages of vitamins, minerals, and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA (3-11). The nutrients are all needed, acting in concert, to maintain DNA and telomere integrity with age.
Evidence continues to mount showing that diet and lifestyle does greatly influence the speed of telomere shortening with age. Other behaviors that can help preserve telomeres are managing stress and maintaining a healthy weight (4, 12).

Isagenix System for “Youthful Aging”
At a time when Baby Boomers are reaching retirement age, Isagenix is investing heavily in telomere research and developing products that allow its customers to age more gracefully. The company’s Pillars of Health products—Cleanse for Life, IsaLean Shake, Ionix Supreme, and Ageless Essentials Daily Pack with Product B—are each intended to help address the problems of more rapid aging (caused by factors including obesity, toxicity, stress, and poor nutrition).
Product B is only the latest of Isagenix products to assist in defying aging, going a step beyond, and targeting underlying mechanisms that lead to telomere shortening. Specifically, the product acts to protect telomeres from an overabundance of free radicals with a combination of ingredients that promote antioxidant enzyme efficiency.

Experiments on cells performed in Dr. Andrews’s lab show Product B is capable of turning on expression of the enzyme telomerase, which restores telomere length. The research is fascinating for anyone interested in a longer, healthier life. More research in 2012 is set to find out what to expect of Product B in the future.
References
  1. Sahin E, Colla S, Liesa M et al. Telomere dysfunction induces metabolic and mitochondrial compromise. Nature 2011;470:359-65.
  2. Jaskelioff M, Muller FL, Paik JH et al. Telomerase reactivation reverses tissue degeneration in aged telomerase-deficient mice. Nature 2011;469:102-6.
  3. Bendix L et al. Leukocyte telomere length and physical ability among Danish Twins age 70+. Mech Ageing Dev. 2011 Oct 12. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.10.003
  4. Puterman E, et al. The power of exercise: buffering the effect of chronic stress on telomere length. PLos One 2010 May 26;5(5):e1083.
  5. Cherkas L, et al. The Association Between Physical Activity in Leisure Time and Leukocyte Telomere Length. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(2):154-158.
  6. Paul L. Diet, nutrition and telomere length. J Nutr Biochem 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.12.001
  7. Cassidy A, De V, I, Liu Y et al. Associations between diet, lifestyle factors, and telomere length in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:1273-80.
  8. Xu Q, Parks CG, DeRoo LA, Cawthon RM, Sandler DP, Chen H. Multivitamin use and telomere length in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1857-63.
  9. Richards JB et al. Homocysteine levels and leukocyte telomere length. Atherosclerosis 2008;200: 271-77.
  10. Richards JB et al. Higher serum vitamin D concentrations are associated with longer leukocyte telomere length in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 1420-5.
  11. Farzaneh-Far R et al. Associations of Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid Levels with Telomeric Aging in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA 2010; 303(3):250-7.
  12. Kim S et al. Obesity and weight gain in adulthood and telomere length. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2009; 18: 816-20.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Good Tips for a Good Walk

As you know if you have been reading my posts, I am doing a lot more walking these days.  I found some interesting tips on the web that I thought I would share with you. 

A study by researchers at Harvard School of Public Health found brisk walking was associated wpreventing weight gain and maintaining weight loss whereas slow walking was not.  The difference between the two lies with you.  While the CDC reports brisk walking to be ≥ 3.5 mph, your level of exertion determines if brisk walking is the moderate intensity activity it is intended to be.  Ideally a brisk walk means you are between 50 and 70% of your maximum heart rate (MHR).  If you don’t know your MHR, use the talk test: you should be breathing harder than usual and be able to speak in long sentences, but not able to sing. Brisk walking isn’t just a faster leisurely walk; it requires proper posture and total body effort, complete with relaxed shoulders, eyes looking forward, and hands relaxed. As one arm moves forward, the other moves back, while alternating with each step.  
The CDC recommends 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity a week and two or more days of muscle strengthening activities.  So if you’re just starting out, brisk walking can have far-reaching benefits for your overall health.

Brisk walking also improves endurance, which can prepare you for more intense activity down the road.   Try interval-style walking: Three minutes of fast walking, then three minutes of slower walking, repeated ten times.

A walking program to try

(This article was first printed in the Special Health Report from Harvard Medical School "Exercise: A Program You Can Live With." For more information or to order, please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/special_health_reports/Exercise.htm.)
Before you take your first steps, follow these guidelines to plan your program.
  • Find a safe place to walk. Options include quiet streets, trails in parks, athletic tracks at local schools, or a shopping mall.
  • Invest in a good pair of shoes. Shoes for walking should have thick, flexible soles that cushion your feet and elevate your heel a half to three-quarters of an inch above the sole. The upper portion of the shoe should be constructed of “breathable” materials such as nylon mesh or leather.
  • Wear clothes appropriate to the season. Wear lighter clothes than you’d need if you were standing still; you’ll warm up as you exercise. Dress in layers so you can peel off garments if you get hot.
  • Warm-up and cool-down. Include five-minute warm-up and cool-down segments as part of your total walking time. A slow walk is a good warm-up and cool-down. Or you may want to stretch for your cool-down (but not as a warm-up since you should only stretch muscles that have been adequately warmed up).

Practice good walking technique:

  • Walk at a brisk, steady pace. Slow down if you’re too breathless to carry on a conversation.
  • Keep your back straight, and gently contract your stomach muscles.
  • Hold your head up. Lift your chest and shoulders.
  • Point your toes straight ahead.
  • Let your arms swing loosely at your sides. If you want to boost your speed, bend your elbows at a 90-degree angle and swing your hands from waist to chest height.
  • Land on your heel and roll forward onto the ball of your foot, pushing off from your toes. Walking flat-footed or only on the ball of the foot may lead to soreness and fatigue.
  • Take long, easy strides, but don’t strain. To go faster, take quicker steps instead of longer ones.
  • Lean forward slightly when walking faster or going up hills.

Sample walking program

Follow the plan charted below to build up your strength and endurance. If you haven’t been exercising, start at the beginning. If you’re already exercising, but want to increase your activity, start at the level that best matches your current routine and build from there.

A walking program to try

Sessions per weekWarm-upWalking timeCool-downTotal minutes
Week 125 min. slow walking5 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking15 min.
Week 235 min. slow walking5 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking15 min.
Week 345 min. slow walking10 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking20 min.
Week 455 min. slow walking10 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking20 min.
Week 565 min. slow walking10 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking20 min.
Weeks 6–765 min. slow walking15 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking25 min.
Week 865 min. slow walking20 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking30 min.
Week 965 min. slow walking25 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking35 min.
Week 1065 min. slow walking30 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking40 min.
Week 1165 min. slow walking40 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking50 min.
Week 1275 min. slow walking50 min. brisk walking5 min. slow walking60 min.

(This article was first printed in the Special Health Report from Harvard Medical School "Exercise: A Program You Can Live With." For more information or to order, please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/special_health_reports/Exercise.htm.)

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Are You A Night Owl?

I have to confess I am writing this blog entry after midnight, so I am guilty of not getting enough sleep.  I found these two studies that show that not getting enough sleep not only slows your metabolism but it makes it harder for you to lose your excess fat.

Here are excerpts from the studies: 


Lack of Sleep Slows Metabolism

A small study published by Dr. Christian Benedict in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that a lack of sleep slows metabolism.  In the study, healthy men were examined after a good night’s sleep compared to a night of continuous wakefulness.  The results showed a reduction in energy expenditure by 5 to 20% in participants as well as elevated levels of ghrelin, a hormone that promotes hunger, and blood sugar after sleep deprivation.  With the study only examining one night of sleep deprivation, it raises the question of how metabolism is affected over time by a lack of sleep. 


Sleep More and Lose More Fat

A study conducted by the University of Chicago and the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that, regardless of their diet and exercise regimen, dieters lost more fat when they got more sleep.  The study placed obese and overweight participants in two groups, one with 5.5 hours of sleep and one which got 8.5 hours of sleep over a 14-day span.  With the same exercise and diet during that time, those with more sleep lost more than 50% of their weight from fat, while the group with 5.5 hours of sleep saw only a 25% fat loss.  Despite consistent evidence, small studies do have not offered definitive or causative indicators as to why this is, so it’s incumbent on Americans to make sleep a priority.